|
07-12-2006, 2:07 PM
|
Reply
|
Ive been riding just in the summers for about 2 years now i am very comfortable on my board i can jump w2w no prob, and can do a frontside 180 but i dont know what i should try next like whats the next progressive trick??
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
07-12-2006, 2:09 PM
|
Reply
|
can you do toeside W2W and toeside 180??
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
07-12-2006, 2:15 PM
|
Reply
|
half cab? grab 180?
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
07-12-2006, 2:48 PM
|
Reply
|
frontside roll to revert!
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
07-12-2006, 3:13 PM
|
Reply
|
what's a frontside roll?
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
07-12-2006, 4:14 PM
|
Reply
|
Toeside back roll-to-fakie landing
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
07-12-2006, 5:46 PM
|
Reply
|
hs fs 3, joe i think he means a hs roll2revert
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
07-12-2006, 6:13 PM
|
Reply
|
Get an invert... go for a backroll or a tantrum. Also get another trick switch wake to wake from whatever side you land on after your 180! It'll be nice to start linking stuff!
|
07-12-2006, 9:28 PM
|
Reply
|
what is a half cab
|
07-12-2006, 9:29 PM
|
Reply
|
Switch HS 180 = Half cab
|
Join Date: May 2003
07-12-2006, 9:36 PM
|
Reply
|
Grab your 180!! once you grab the 180, do a 360.
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
07-12-2006, 9:40 PM
|
Reply
|
quote:Switch HS 180 = Half cab
actually it's w2w switch 180, whether hs or ts.
|
07-12-2006, 9:42 PM
|
Reply
|
Thanks Joe I didn't know that. I always thought it was switch HS.
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
07-12-2006, 9:50 PM
|
Reply
|
well, i've been wrong before. as far as i know, in order for it to be a "legit" half cab, it has to be switch and done w2w. otherwise, it's just a 1-wake 180.
|
07-12-2006, 9:52 PM
|
Reply
|
Good to know.
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
07-12-2006, 11:17 PM
|
Reply
|
thanks Brian for starting this thread. i'm in the same boat- and thinking of the next challenge, errr i mean next concussion. joe/j-rod- half cab and 360 sound like a reasonable progression for an old geezer like me who isn't thinking invert of anykind...
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
07-12-2006, 11:21 PM
|
Reply
|
Joe, Probably correct but I think it's more a matter of opinion rather then right or wrong... Either way the switch FS 180 is correct.
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tyler
07-13-2006, 6:49 AM
|
Reply
|
me too. working on TS1, then switch , then a 3. I'm thinking TS 3 would be easiest. which 3 do you guys think is easiest or that you landed first? then a roll if the 3 gives me trouble. threw a tantrum twice. got close, but my bro broke his foot right before my set. at the time we didn't know it was broken, but now its kinda messin with my head. i'll definitely get over it
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
07-13-2006, 7:16 AM
|
Reply
|
nacho, I found the HS 3 to be the most natural to throw. Just makes more sense to me...
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
07-14-2006, 8:37 AM
|
Reply
|
Make sure you can do all 4 180's (regular heelside and toeside, switch heelside and toeside). Get comfortable riding switch and then move up to harder tricks like heelside backrolls.
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
07-14-2006, 8:57 AM
|
Reply
|
Wow, inverts after learning the first 180? Everyone is always so quick to go updside down. I personally learned the backside 180 after the frontside. Most people don't bother to learn it and I think it looks killer. I wish I had the nuts to do those neat flippy things.
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
07-14-2006, 8:59 AM
|
Reply
|
While flip0 are "neat", Backside 180's IMO look way cooler. Benny G in relentless is money with those BS 180's.
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
07-14-2006, 11:52 AM
|
Reply
|
I think why they say inverts first is because the general concensus is that the basic inverts are easier than 3s and even backside 180s? At least that's what I have been lead to believe... However I must go with what Big Ed suggested, can you go TS w2w? If so, what about going TS 180? I think you should get your TS jumps dialed in first. Then I think the next step in progression would be to grab your 180s, then from there perhaps the backside 180s... Anyways I'm nowhere near as good a rider as most of these guys and gals but that is my opinion of where you should head to progress.
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
07-14-2006, 5:26 PM
|
Reply
|
fs 900's. off axis would be the easiest way to do it.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:42 PM.
|
|