|
Join Date: Dec 2005
09-22-2014, 10:11 AM
|
Reply
|
Malibu pays $20M to settle lawsuit, restates earnings.
http://www.knoxnews.com/business/mal...nings_74881444
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
09-22-2014, 11:23 AM
|
Reply
|
Ouch.
I'm sure that won't affect new boat prices.....
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
09-22-2014, 11:42 AM
|
Reply
|
Phil from Kicker posted this link on another site that talks about the patent issue a little more:
http://www.theordinaryobserver.com/2...lds-ltd-v.html
and the latest:
http://www.theordinaryobserver.com/2...nightmare.html
|
Join Date: May 2009
09-22-2014, 12:05 PM
|
Reply
|
Just another example of how US litigation and patent laws on vague designs gave approached the ludicrous. It's unbelievable that the entire boat profit, not just cost of windshield is up for grabs.
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
09-22-2014, 12:12 PM
|
Reply
|
I know, right? How could anyone mistake Malibu's design for this patented version?
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
09-22-2014, 2:57 PM
|
Reply
|
Hey, that looks like a Malibu windshield!
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
09-22-2014, 3:05 PM
|
Reply
|
Maybe that explains the lawsuit against Nautique anyone can see the NSS is an exact copy of the surf gate.
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
09-22-2014, 8:31 PM
|
Reply
|
Eh, that's only 200-225 boats give or take
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
09-22-2014, 8:54 PM
|
Reply
|
That just sucks. that a patent can be so general.
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
09-22-2014, 9:24 PM
|
Reply
|
I never understood why Malibu abandoned the ~2005 windshields that were curved with no supports/vents. They were beautiful and gave a full line of sight. These vented windshields took away the beautiful lines, look like a cheaper patch job, and apparently are going to cost Malibu 20M. Yikes.
Who needs vents on an open boat? I'd much prefer no vents for warmth. I'm somewhere between cool and freezing while driving on a plane probably 50% of the season. I don't think I've ever been too hot while on a plane (idling sure, but the vents don't help there).
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
09-23-2014, 5:04 AM
|
Reply
|
The Malibus are soo smoking hot you need the vents to cool off. JK
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
09-23-2014, 11:30 AM
|
Reply
|
Couldn't agree with Adam more. Such great lines ruined by "progress."
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
09-24-2014, 6:05 AM
|
Reply
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lfadam
I
Who needs vents on an open boat? I'd much prefer no vents for warmth. I'm somewhere between cool and freezing while driving on a plane probably 50% of the season. I don't think I've ever been too hot while on a plane (idling sure, but the vents don't help there).
|
That is very dependent on where you live. Adjustable vents would be the ticket. I would not think of running without my bimini 95% of the days or having a dark colored boat or dark colors on my seats. Ouch, way too hot.
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
09-24-2014, 9:11 PM
|
Reply
|
hmmm i fail to see the logic in a stock going up the day after backtracking earnings and reporting a loss like this. somethings fishy there.
|
Join Date: May 2013
09-25-2014, 11:26 PM
|
Reply
|
You guys think Malibu going public had anything to do with raising funds to pay that 20m settlement?
|
Join Date: May 2010
09-26-2014, 10:22 AM
|
Reply
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Froggy
Maybe that explains the lawsuit against Nautique anyone can see the NSS is an exact copy of the surf gate.
|
I hope this is sarcasm
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
09-27-2014, 4:29 AM
|
Reply
|
J, it may have , although this is bad for everyone. Now that this has set the stage for patent infringement law suits (that have been successful), it could open the door for more pressure from other builders. Only means slower competitive development and higher prices. 20 mil is a ton of money for such a small company.
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
09-29-2014, 9:21 AM
|
Reply
|
They should always break this down into the actual lawsuit payment and the lawyers fees.
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
09-29-2014, 10:05 AM
|
Reply
|
I'm sure the settlement amount doesn't include malibu's attorneys' fees, and probably is a lump sum payment to PCMW, so they will pay their lawyers from the fee (to the extent their lawyers haven't been paid already along the way).
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
09-29-2014, 4:39 PM
|
Reply
|
The most likely scenario is Malibu pays PCMW $20m. Malibu pays its attorneys separately and in addition to the $20m. PCMW pays its attorneys (which can be from the $20m settlement).
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tyler
09-30-2014, 9:32 AM
|
Reply
|
Malibu owns the patent for surfgate systems. started filing it in 2012. Patents are written to be very general so that they encompass as much of the industry as they can unless the opposition wants to fight it in court, costing them money.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 4:22 AM.
|
|