NFL Smack Talking Thread 2013!

Its like DT is back there. They're looking damn good. What a crazy turn around from last year.

I love seeing Alex Smith and Andy Reid giving the finger to the 49ers and Philly. Although KC really hasn't played a top tier team yet, should be interesting when they head to Denver. Definitely the biggest surprise of the season so far.

Darren, bobby never puts his money where his mouth is. I've tried and here's why. Even he doesn't believe the crap falling out of his face.

Originally Posted by hatepain

Darren, bobby never puts his money where his mouth is. I've tried and here's why. Even he doesn't believe the crap falling out of his face.

I put my money in solid investments.That's why i'm retiring at the end of the year.LOL

That is some pretty good picking by Justin but he did miss the STL/Houston game..

Originally Posted by polarbill

That is some pretty good picking by Justin but he did miss the STL/Houston game..

But he picked all the games. He smoked me. I got 5 wrong so far.

The difference in the Hawks/Titans game was Locker being out. With him starting and Fitzpatrick where he needs to be (holding the clipboard), the outcome of that game would be different.

And Rich, CJ has not been a "premiere RB" for the past two seasons. 3 ypc is about all you can expect out of him lately. And with Fitz constantly lobbing passes to the other team, it is not the least bit shocking that we didn't score an offensive TD yesterday. The Titan's D is the only thing keeping the games even remotely close. The Titans had zero turnovers for the season prior to Locker being injured. And I think there are teams in Denver and New Orleans that are going to be in the way of it "being lights out for the rest of the league". I see Seattle being eliminated in the 2nd round of the playoffs (after a first round bye).

Originally Posted by wake77

The difference in the Hawks/Titans game was Locker being out. With him starting and Fitzpatrick where he needs to be (holding the clipboard), the outcome of that game would be different.

And Rich, CJ has not been a "premiere RB" for the past two seasons. 3 ypc is about all you can expect out of him lately. And with Fitz constantly lobbing passes to the other team, it is not the least bit shocking that we didn't score an offensive TD yesterday. The Titan's D is the only thing keeping the games even remotely close. The Titans had zero turnovers for the season prior to Locker being injured. And I think there are teams in Denver and New Orleans that are going to be in the way of it "being lights out for the rest of the league". I see Seattle being eliminated in the 2nd round of the playoffs (after a first round bye).

You don't really want to start comparing injured players that would have affected the outcome of the game do you? We had a few key players on our O line and one offensive player I think you may have heard of. A healthy Locker against a healthy O line and the score would have been retarded yesterday.

Surprisingly Skins defense played well but we gave up 21 points on special teams and a turn over. Unlike Hawks, Skins are not good enough to come back from that. RG3 looked more mobile but his throws were off. Looks like Skins season will come down to beating the Cowgirls later in the year and hopefully keeping them out of the playoffs again.

Originally Posted by larry1167

Surprisingly Skins defense played well but we gave up 21 points on special teams and a turn over. Unlike Hawks, Skins are not good enough to come back from that. RG3 looked more mobile but his throws were off. Looks like Skins season will come down to beating the Cowgirls later in the year and hopefully keeping them out of the playoffs again.

Without Ware most of the game and no running game without Murray.A defensive line that was missing 3 starters." Come on man" you guys suck!

Originally Posted by cwb4me

Without Ware most of the game and no running game without Murray.A defensive line that was missing 3 starters." Come on man" you guys suck!

Skins do suck but we spotted you guys 21 points. If not for our ****ty special teams it would have been a close game. What does that say about the Cowgirls?

Originally Posted by seattle

You don't really want to start comparing injured players that would have affected the outcome of the game do you? We had a few key players on our O line and one offensive player I think you may have heard of. A healthy Locker against a healthy O line and the score would have been retarded yesterday.

Come on, you guys comparing someone on the O-line to a QB? Give me an effing break. And yes Percy Harvin is a great player, but let's say he scored two TD's (way more than his per game average ever was in MN), with Locker in there, how exactly would the "score have been retarded"? What you are implying is that Harvin would have done something he has yet to do in his career with something Locker has done in his career?

Yes or No answer. Is Seattle as good a team with their backup QB starting?

Wake, would love to have seen Locker in there. Everyone in western Washington loves him. However, I don't think the ultimate outcome would have been different. The big difference in that game was our place kicker getting absolutely trucked! He's in that game is 23-6. The normal place holder was trying to kick the balk and I don't know what the hell the back up place kicker was trying to do

Robert, can't really blame you. RG3's fumble on the 3 cost me a pair of flip flops. Me and my buddy have weird bets.

At least you realize your trash talk isn't "solid".

"Without Locker the outcome would have been different"???? What about the Hawks O line, Zach Miller and Percy Harvin? Sorry but there is no way Locker or any other QB is going to win at C-Link.
I love that the Hawks beat a 3-2 team and ended the game in the victory formation, yet people think they are slipping. Please keep doubting them and saying we are "ripe for the picking".

Originally Posted by 83Starsnstripes

"Without Locker the outcome would have been different"???? What about the Hawks O line, Zach Miller and Percy Harvin? Sorry but there is no way Locker or any other QB is going to win at C-Link.
I love that the Hawks beat a 3-2 team and ended the game in the victory formation, yet people think they are slipping. Please keep doubting them and saying we are "ripe for the picking".

And Peyton Manning would destroy the Hawks on any field.

Seattle with their backup QB is still better than the Titans even with Locker! And yes Manning looks great (and we all know he is) but look who the Broncos have in the last 5 weeks....NYG, OAK, PHI, JAC, DAL... HAHA! I would look good throwing against those teams, Lol, "put me in coach". I mean c'mon, NYG & JAC are far and above the two worst teams in the NFL. The Raiders are aweful, and the Cowboys and Eagles are average.... so yeah of course the Broncos are winning.

I wish nothing but success for Locker because he was a Husky but he's not even in the top 10 QB discussion at this point.

Manning is lucky the Hawks aren't in the AFC West anymore. We'd finish the job on that stiff neck of his.

Redskins were in similar field positions and settled for field goals. GAME OVER.

Originally Posted by cwb4me

Redskins were in similar field positions and settled for field goals. GAME OVER.

Wrong. Redskins drove the length of the field to get into Dallas territory. Much different than being handed the football at the 5 and 15. Please use more caps and all of those smiley face symbols to get your point across. That will definitely help everyone believe your nonsense. You're a lost cause and I am done with you.

So what your saying is ANY QB could win with the rest of the Seattle team

No, we'd lose if we had Romo

Legion of Boom Effect!!!

No, no, no. Hawks would totally win with Romo, well until the playoffs.

^^^this

pls don't utter the words Hawks and Romo in the same sentence, its a bad omen!

The #LegionofBoomEffect! is entertaining... but I'd be more than happy if it ended this week. :-)

^^^^what is your point??
Broncos have played:
wk 1 Ravens (3-3)
wk 2 Giants (0-6)
wk 3 Raiders (2-4)
wk 4 Eagles (3-3)
wk 5 Cowgirls (3-3)
wk 6 Jaguars (0-6)
Combined 11-25.

This is the NFL, not the BCS. Strength of schedule means nothing.

^I'm not a Broncos fan.

Do you honestly think Trey Wingo believes that?!? I'm pretty sure he was just pointing out a humorous little coincidence... not saying that the Seahawks really caused those losses. Except for the Texans... I definitely think the Seahawks broke the Texans.

Go Cardinals!!!!!

Seattle at Arizona HAWKS

Tampa Bay at Atlanta ATL
Cincinnati at Detroit LIONS
Buffalo at Miami MIAMI
New England at NY Jets PATS
Dallas at Philadelphia EAGLES
Chicago at Washington BEARS
St. Louis at Carolina RAMS
San Diego at Jacksonville SD
San Francisco at Tennessee 49ERS
Cleveland at Green Bay PACK
Houston at Kansas City TX
Baltimore at Pittsburgh RAVENS
Denver at Indianapolis BRONCOS

Minnesota at NY Giants GIANTS

WEEK 7 PICKS
Thursday night

SEA @ ARI - Cardinals at home.

Sunday at 1:00

TB @ ATL - Falcons
CIN @DET-Lions
BUF @ MIA - Dolphins
NE @ NYJ - Patriots
DAL @ PHI - Cowboys
Chi @ WAS -DA BEARS in a EASY win!
STL @ CAR - Panthers at home.
SD @ JAC - Chargers
SF @ TEN - 49ERS
CLE @ GB - Packers
HOU @ KC - Chiefs
BAL @ PIT - This is a toss up.But i'll take the Steelers at home.
DEN @ IND - COLTS stop the win streak of the Broncos!

MIN @ NYG - Giants

Hawks @ Cards - Hawks defense wins the game.

Rams @ Panthers - Panthers

Niners @ Titans - Legion of Boom effect in full force.

For Bobby,

Dallas @ Philly - Philly

Originally Posted by cwb4me

WEEK 7 PICKS
Thursday night

SEA @ ARI - Cardinals at home.

Sunday at 1:00

TB @ ATL - Falcons
CIN @DET-Lions
BUF @ MIA - Dolphins
NE @ NYJ - Patriots
DAL @ PHI - Cowboys
Chi @ WAS -DA BEARS in a EASY win!
STL @ CAR - Panthers at home.
SD @ JAC - Chargers
SF @ TEN - 49ERS
CLE @ GB - Packers
HOU @ KC - Chiefs
BAL @ PIT - This is a toss up.But i'll take the Steelers at home.
DEN @ IND - COLTS stop the win streak of the Broncos!

MIN @ NYG - Giants

Got my ass handed to me this week.

I was worried abot this game a little but I see Lil' Bobby picked against us which usually works out just great for The Hawks

Hawks by two...field goals

I see a 3-4 point win by hawks. A grinder. The public is heavy on the hawks and the under. I am leaning towards AZ getting 6. If this is in SEA - different game. AZ could sneak this one out too on the big stage of Thursday night. Seattle has has some lucky breaks and those can't continue.

That was too easy...

If I recall there was a Williams guy floating around here early on questioning our ability to beat the Cards. Wonder where he's been lately???

Turns out we covered again! Thanks Bobby boy for doubting us. Turned out like it always does with another SEEEEEEAAA....HAAAAWKS WIN!!!!

Twelve Man goin off on NFL network after the game... priceless!

Managed to ugly up what could have been a dominant effort... but still. 6-1. Big Win. Go Hawks.

Originally Posted by digg311

Managed to ugly up what could have been a dominant effort... but still. 6-1. Big Win. Go Hawks.

Tough D up against a weak O line...

We owned the second half and coasted the through the fourth on the road against a divisional team. BIG WIN!

Above comments seen through Seahawks Goggles! Still saw protection problems. No 100 yard rusher.Carson Palmer giving another gift on his quest to catch Eli.

I don't see how the Cardinals could be anyone with that O-Line.

HAHAHA no 100 yard rusher?? When has that ever mattered?? Look at AP, runs for 100+ all the time and the Vikings still lose.

Hawks destroyed the Cards last night. Lynch trucked Dockett and knocked his helmet off!! Bambam destroyed Winston then makes the tackle on Ellington. This game was over in the 1st Quarter. Can't wait for Monday night!! Percy is going for 200 yards!!

Robert, how 'bout you take off those Hawk Hater Goggles and step into reality! You can spew all the stats you want, talk about pocket protection, or lack of a 100 yard rusher, but the plain fact is, your Cowgirls can't hang with the HAWKS. What makes the Hawks so much superior then your Cowgirls is that they have a smart and savy QB, a Beast of running back, and a Defense who will knock you flat on your butt and still talk about your mama. GO HAWKS!!!

Don't worry Bobby will be done with this thread after Sunday and the Cowgirls are 3-4 because a backup QB just torched them for 35+ points.

Bitch slapped by Beast Mode.

My my you guys are mighty sensitive!

Looks like i win the picks again this week. That was easy!

Check again there Nancy...

We tied...

Originally Posted by seattle

Check again there Nancy...

We tied...

My name isn't Nancy. You only picked 4 games. Picking "THE" games is picking all the games.That's a true test of you knowledge of the whole league. It's easier to pick your division.

And the Chiefs are now 7-0 and have the best record in the NFL. This makes me happy.

RG3 is well enough to run the read option again and we score 45 points. That's the good news. Bad news... our special teams gave up another TD and our secondary still stinks. I will take the win though.

Looks like Locker's return made a big difference. Romo did his best to lose another big game (RTG 69.2) but Philly was worse.

Originally Posted by 83Starsnstripes

Looks like Locker's return made a big difference. Romo did his best to lose another big game (RTG 69.2) but Philly was worse.

Romo won by 14 points on the road.One of his interceptions was a garbage hail mary just before the half.I think he may have caught Russell Wilson in interceptions now. He threw for over 300 yards also better than R.W. Dallas defense didn't allow a TD all day to a TOP OFFENSE and collected 3 picks while they were at it. Those are the facts.What do they mean? Not much at this point in the season. Leading your division right now doesn't mean squat. Kansas City is the only team left with something to brag about. As Denver lost to the Colts like i predicted.

^^^^^HAHAHAHA "TOP OFFENSE" that's a good one. And yes Romo didn't just match RW for INTs but passed him too. Congrats on the big win!! Picking off Matt Barkley is like beating Romo in a big game, easy and predictable.

Originally Posted by 83Starsnstripes

^^^^^HAHAHAHA "TOP OFFENSE" that's a good one. And yes Romo didn't just match RW for INTs but passed him too. Congrats on the big win!! Picking off Matt Barkley is like beating Romo in a big game, easy and predictable.

HA HA look again RETARD! If your azz was as big as your mouth your guts would fall out. LOL NFL.COM #1 Offense Denver,#2 Green Bay, # 3 Philadelphia. The # 1 rushing Offense is the Eagles 11 yards a game over your Squawks. Your so full of chit you can't even see the FACTS! The Cowboys have played or will play 7 of the top 10 offenses this year.Some more than once Eagles and Redskins.Brag about all the meaningless games you want,i'll stick with the facts.Fact #1 Seahawks trophy case is EMPTY. Fact # 2 Seahawks haven't been to a championship game in YEARS. All this talk of dominance and legion of boom only to CHOKE when it counts the most. Just the facts. Don't worry i'll keep reminding you the facts all season!!!!

Hated seeing all the big injuries this week.

Glad to see RG3 getting it together. Would love to see Washington get strong from here on out.

KC's defense is legit. But... I see them as a good team with a great record... and I think by the end of the season that record will be a little more reflective of their true quality.

The Cowboys... man I just don't know. With Washington starting in a hole, they seem like the class of that lame division... but would it really surprise anyone if they still failed to make the playoffs?

Cowboys will have a 9-7 record at best. They play the Lions, Saints, Bears, and Skins all on the road. I don't see them winning any of those games. I could see them making the playoffs the last game of the season if they beat Philly in Dallas. I unfortunately think it's over for the Skins this year.

Originally Posted by 83Starsnstripes

Cowboys will have a 9-7 record at best. They play the Lions, Saints, Bears, and Skins all on the road. I don't see them winning any of those games. I could see them making the playoffs the last game of the season if they beat Philly in Dallas. I unfortunately think it's over for the Skins this year.

Yeah Skins are on life support. We still have a chance because of the weak division but it's slim. We're not going anywhere unless we fix our special teams and secondary and that probably won't happen until next year. We seriously need to kick the ball out of bounds on all punts.

I'm just glad to see RG3 coming around. He wants to be a pocket passer but he's so good at the read option. Once the linebackers and safties start hesitating is when our offense starts clicking. This doesn't happen when RG3 just drops back all game.

Just ignore Bobby.

^^^whatever makes you feel good about beating Nick Foles and Matt Barkley. Who cares about yards?? I'll take points and wins when considering a top offense.
I like the fact of 6-1 vs. 4-3. That's a pretty good fact.
Please remind me of the last time the Cowgirls were in a championship game? Heck even a second round playoff game?

Also, "retard"?? C'mon bro it's 2013.

Originally Posted by 83Starsnstripes

^^^whatever makes you feel good about beating Nick Foles and Matt Barkley. Who cares about yards?? I'll take points and wins when considering a top offense.
I like the fact of 6-1 vs. 4-3. That's a pretty good fact.
Please remind me of the last time the Cowgirls were in a championship game? Heck even a second round playoff game?

Also, "retard"?? C'mon bro it's 2013.

Seahawks have only played 2 teams with a winning record.They lost one of those.They only have 2 games left against winning teams! Talk about a soft schedule? Dallas has played 3 teams with a winning record and still has to play 4 teams with winning records. The year isn't over yet.Lets hope you don't fall to the 0-6 Giants.

Its a bummer that the Hawks have no chance at playing Dallas this year. The Hawks will have a bye in the first round and as we know, if Dallas does make the playoffs they will lose in the first round.

Originally Posted by hatepain

Its a bummer that the Hawks have no chance at playing Dallas this year. The Hawks will have a bye in the first round and as we know, if Dallas does make the playoffs they will lose in the first round.

You are assuming a lot. Seattle hasn't won the division yet ,much less a bye.There's over half the season left. All kinds of things can change! Remember you still have to play the Giants,49ers and Saints.Also the Falcons could take you down. God help you if you lose to the Rams,Bucs or the Cardinals. Don't overlook the Vikings either.

If we lose to either the Vikings or the Giants we should just forefiet the rest out our season... Last night was the worst Monday Night game I have ever seen!

All kinds of things can change!

I know, we're going to get better.

Originally Posted by hatepain

I know, we're going to get better.

If you call that better,you are on drugs.

Hawks get Percy and rumor has it Mike Robinson back this week. Bradford is out for the season. MNF never looks so good!!!

Didn't watch the Vikes and Giants but why are the Vikings even throwing the ball??? They have the best player on earth in the backfield. Hand the ball off every time, maybe pitch it if you want to get crazy but the fact that AP only gets 13 carries is ridiculous.

Hawks get Percy

I think PErcy can just start practicing, I thought he wouldn't be ready to play until late November.... I oculd be wrong though.

maybe pitch it if you want to get crazy but the fact that AP only gets 13 carries is ridiculous.

Agreed. Throwing 50+ times with a QB who has been with your team for 2 weeks = stupid..... anything less than 30 touches to AP is a mistake. The vikings are bad because their management is total trash. Almost every decision they've made in the last few years has been sub-par, but then again hindsight is 20/20.

.... I won't be shocked if they start shopping AP and just admit defeat and plan for the future.

[QUOTE=sidekicknicholas;1850119]I think PErcy can just start practicing, I thought he wouldn't be ready to play until late November.... I oculd be wrong though.

Percy could start on Monday if they wanted him to go.

Here's the rule:
Commencing on the day after the conclusion of the sixth regular season weekend (October 15) and continuing through the day after the conclusion of the 11th regular season weekend (November 19), clubs are permitted to begin practicing players on Reserve/Physically Unable to Perform for a period not to exceed 21 calendar days. Pads and helmets are permitted during the 21-day period. At any time during the 21-day practice period, or prior to 4:00 p.m., New York time, on the day after the conclusion of the 21-day period, clubs are permitted to restore such players on Reserve/Physically Unable to Perform to their Active/Inactive List.

Basically, a player on the PUP list entering the regular season could make his regular-season debut as early as Week 7 or as late as Week 15 under the new rules.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post...e-on-pup-rules

^^I bet Percy will dress for the game but get limited plays. No sense putting him in if we are rolling the Rams.

Originally Posted by 83Starsnstripes

^^I bet Percy will dress for the game but get limited plays. No sense putting him in if we are rolling the Rams.

Rolling the Rams? More like getting DOMINATED.

If Percy is ready to go, I think they'll start him and use him. If he's not ready for full-go, I don't see them bumping a guy to put him on the roster just to sit and watch.

They also just re-signed Mike Rob... which brings me no end of happiness. The 6-1 Seahawks are getting stronger and stronger.

Week 7 power rankings are out.

I have charted them and computed the per team competitor averages.

You can see that the Chiefs are likely over-rated since they have had a soft schedule.

You can also see that Seahawks, Colts and 49ers have not had these soft schedules.

It also interesting that Titans, Texans and Jaguars have had it rough (playing the NFC west).

Note, an average ranking difference of 8 to 9 is huge -- that's nearly a 1/3 of the league!

I added Next Opponent Deltas to show the heavy favorites for this week -- lots of heavy favorites.

Originally Posted by diamonddad

Week 7 power rankings are out.

I have charted them and computed the per team competitor averages.

You can see that the Chiefs are likely over-rated since they have had a soft schedule.

You can also see that Seahawks, Colts and 49ers have not had these soft schedules.

It also interesting that Titans, Texans and Jaguars have had it rough (playing the NFC west).

Note, an average ranking difference of 8 to 9 is huge -- that's nearly a 1/3 of the league!

Your point is 16 teams had a tougher schedule than the Seahawks. Enough information to put them in the BOTTOM HALF schedule wise. What's your point again?

Small differences in average competitor ratings are not significant.

The biggest story here is that the CHIEFS/BRONCOS have had it easy compared to the COLTS/49ERS.

Here's some up to date Stats.
Romo 181 comp. 265 att. 68.3% 2010 yards 287.1 YPG 15 TD's 5 INT's 101.6 QBR
Wilson 115 comp.187 att. 61.5% 1489 yards 212.7 YPG 11 TD's 4 INT's 97.2 QBR

Just keeping you guys up to date on INDIVIDUAL STATS !

This will help you with your Wilson vs. Romo comparisons. Wins are a TEAM STAT. See your chart above to reference Dallas has played a TOUGHER SCHEDULE than Seattle.

Like always guys just the facts here.

]Some more interesting facts from NFL.COM. Which QB has the most passing yards in their first 100 starts?

#5 Trent Green 25108 yards

#4 Peyton Manning 26008 yards

#3 Dan Marino 27274 yards


# 2 Kurt Warner 27441 yards


# 1 TONY ROMO 27485 YARDS!!!!!!!!

Have the Chiefs had a cupcake schedule, yep... but hey, winning any game in the NFL isn't easy (except maybe against the Jags). If the Seahawks were 7-0 against the same schedule i'm sure none of you Seattle guys would say they didn't deserve a #1 rank.

again, last year the Chiefs won 2 friggin games. I couldn't be happier at 7-0. Got tickets to Camarohead for the Nov 24 game against the Chargers, can't wait.