New User Here Looking To Buy A Fish .

Currently riding a older hyperlite " has a picture of a hotrod with flames up and down the board " and no its not the mid 90's hotrod . it has a twin flat tip and two fins . lol can't find the name of it . but i'm looking for a fish but i can't decide on the 129 or 133 . I'm 160lbs at 6'4'' . the boat is a 19ft boston whaler rage .

At 6'4", I would imagine that you would need a bigger board than a 129 or 133. I would look in the vicinity of 140.

I rode the fish as my first board and i'm 5'7" and weighed 180 lbs. I would recommend getting the biggest size you can get in the fish.

i am 5'9 and 170 in weight , i ride a 133 and luv it , to me the longer boards seem to have too much swing weight for me.

damn at 6'4" and 160 you must be all bones. I am in ok shape and same height 230. I ride 140+ I did hop on my GF's 137 the other day just for the heck of it and it rode pretty good though.

now raymond....he didn't ask for opinions about his height to weight ratio....

*says the guy with a similar problem*

but seriously charles....get a longer board if for nothing more than the wider stance....at 6'4" you need a good wide base.

I rode a 137 Fish last year and I am 6'4". It was a good fit, it depends on your skill level as to whether or not the Fish is a good fit. It has some great aspects and design features, but for some reason, I always slipped out when riding it switch. Granted, alot of that was technique, but otherwise I really loved the board. I haven't been on a 133, but the 137 board felt a little bigger than a 137 due to the width. Stance width was about right for me on this length also, but the board does have a relatively short nose/tail if you are riding all the way out and I almost dipped the front a few times due to this.