Vaccinations?

Originally Posted by brettw

Glad we have people here who know more about vaccinations and their benefits and risks then those pesky ignorant CDC folks.

As far as the number and schedule of vaccines, here's a couple of charts:

Shows by country
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccination_schedule

Looks like about 12 different vaccines for the U.S. if you scroll down to look - some given more than once.

True Brett. Like you said there's a main few they cycle through, and they give them at these different intervals and stages in life and they even say that people should CONTINUE getting some of these same vaccines throughout their lives even through their adult life as well.

Even the CDC themselves admitted several times that there's vaccine's that are not necessarily a benefit; take the recent measles outbreak at Disneyland, I can't exactly remember if one of the sources of the outbreak was already vaccinated prior to the outbreak, or if one of the victims of the outbreak had been vaccinated (have to look at the article again to be sure) but STILL was infected.

I'm no expert on the subject, nor am I trying to discourage people FROM getting their kids vaccinated, vaccinations are good to a point, but the way they have things set up, it's no wonder why the number of vaccine related injuries are on the rise, even here in the states, in other third world countries like India, it's WAY worse.

My biggest thing is that people should do their OWN research into these things rather than just accepting the word of anyone (even mine because I'm no expert, merely pointing out the inconsistencies and holes in these things) even the Physicians out there. Because many physicians today don't really do much in the way of actually treating their patients whether it's cancer or ensuring that a child grows up healthy.

I've seen it firsthand where a surgeon KNOWS there's very little else they can do for the patient and will "bandaid" the patient with gauze and sedation knowing full well that the patient won't last long, send them to post-op or to a room and tell the family with a straight face that the patient is doing fine, because if the patient dies on the table, the surgeon doesn't get paid, and will likely find themselves in front of a review board when that happens. But if the patient dies elsewhere AFTER the surgery, it's really no longer the surgeon's problem.

Now, with the addition of Government digging their claws in to make people comply (even as the Healthcare.gov and Affordable Care Act continues to rot from the ground up and MORE people lose their insurance altogether or their premiums continue to increase, except now the corrupt on BOTH sides of the aisles are getting their cuts in on the deal as well), It's just to run healthcare into the ground while wringing every penny out of everyone. Not that Health insurance was any better BEFORE now (most any type of insurance you get nowadays is a racket regardless of it being house to healthcare), what we have now accelerates the problem. It's just ensuring that the insurance companies get their big payout before it crumbles completely.

We have a Pharmacy court that's been specifically set up in this country decades ago that just pays off the victims and covers the pharmacy corporations so they can continue making billions of dollars. Look at the "treatment" of cancer in it's different forms.

One of the LEAST invasive types of treatment is using high doses of Vitamin C intravenously over several months with the only detriment to the patient is severe thirst and mild headache at 20,000 miligrams (or basically a 2000-3000 liter bag, I may have that right, may need to look at it again). But you'll hear VERY little about this form of treatment because it would basically cut the Pharmaceuticals off at the knees with their profits from the Chemo treatments.

Versus Chemotherapy or surgery (which either of those treatments only leave the patient with a 5yr survival rate, anything beyond that is often a rarity, plus there's ALWAYS the chance that the cancer may return.) At a HUGE expense to the patient because, let's face it, it's another billion dollar industry in healthcare because chemo treatments alone costs thousands of dollars for those chemical cocktails.

My thing is, if the family Doc wants to push the vaccines, hit 'em with the Vaccine safety warranty waiver to hold them more accountable if something adverse DOES happen to your kid(s) post vaccination (just simple precautionary steps, nothing more). If they don't want to sign it, well then there's a decision to be made if you want to continue to allow your kid to be vaccinated or roll the dice and take your chances.

Personally (even though I don't have kids right now) I wouldn't want to take a risk with a physician that wasn't ABSOLUTELY confident that the vaccine they administer was truly safe for their patients by signing off on that waiver.

Physicians tend to get REAL sketchy when it comes to signing documents like that, I've seen many a surgeon put off signing an implant early release form until absolutely necessary (because they wanted to use the implant WELL before it's 48hr sterility quarantine has timed out, and the spore test that was processed with the implants hasn't returned with it's results yet of whether it was positive or negative), Because if something DID happen (like the spore coming up positive because it didn't make it through the proper sterilization perameters and is no good), they've got a LOT of problems ahead of them including placing the patient on antibiotics to ward off the chance of infection or rejection.

It all comes down to your choice.