NZ mass Shooting

Originally Posted by Matt0520

Uh, because that’s the topic at hand sir. Again, awfully presumptive of you that this is my only concern because I’m...staying on topic?

I thought the "topic at hand" was that you are somehow a firearms expert because you own a few and you are an EMT?

Originally Posted by wake77

I thought the "topic at hand" was that you are somehow a firearms expert because you own a few and you are an EMT?

As I said in the other thread, ownership doesn’t mean crap. Armorer certs are a whole different layer of experience with the hardware we’re talking about. That, experience with trauma, ballistics research, etc. I thought was an applicable background here.

Sorry if you feel my experience isn’t relevant or up to standards. I should’ve just lead with hysterics and emotion.

Originally Posted by Matt0520

As I said in the other thread, ownership doesn’t mean crap. Armorer certs are a whole different layer of experience with the hardware we’re talking about. That, experience with trauma, ballistics research, etc. I thought was an applicable background here.

Sorry if you feel my experience isn’t relevant or up to standards. I should’ve just lead with hysterics and emotion.

Where exactly does "ballistics research" fit into this conversation?

When have I used "hysterics and emotion" in any of my posts?

Originally Posted by wake77

Where exactly does "ballistics research" fit into this conversation?

The fact you ask is concerning.

Obviously, the effects of bullets on targets and tissue (which is 'ballistics') should be a large component of the fact-based discussion on firearms and gun control, especially since GC diehards through around phrases like "high-powered" with reckless abandon.