WakeWorld

WakeWorld (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/index.php)
-   Non-Wakeboarding Discussion (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=4387)
-   -   how many people voted for trump due to russia (http://www.wakeworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=808946)

dougr 03-03-2019 2:33 PM

how many people voted for trump due to russia
 
Here we go, how many were influenced by russian propaganda, and voted for trump, due to advertising and or anything so compelling that you could not resist.

Stazi 03-03-2019 3:30 PM

[emoji23]

fly135 03-04-2019 6:18 AM

Three Fiddy

95sn 03-04-2019 11:35 AM

Did there ads say at the bottom, Courtesy of the Kremlin?

wake77 03-04-2019 12:18 PM

Well, enough of you dumbasses believed that he was going to build a big wall and Mexico was going to pay for it, so why wouldn't one think that a bunch of you were duped by the Russians?

Stazi 03-04-2019 1:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wake77 (Post 1986469)
Well, enough of you dumbasses believed that he was going to build a big wall and Mexico was going to pay for it, so why wouldn't one think that a bunch of you were duped by the Russians?



Sorry your girl lost. She was a cheating POS that manufactured the whole BS behind “Russian Collusion” in the form of a fake dossier; meanwhile she signed off on the sale of Uranium to the Russians in exchange for $50M worth paid “speeches”. I know....inconvenient facts.

But keep drinking the kool aid, your space ship will be here soon to rescue you!

95sn 03-04-2019 3:25 PM

Stazi,
This is the actual facts from FOX regarding Clinton "selling uranium" to Russia.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...-sparking-fury

dougr 03-05-2019 6:26 AM

I just really want to see the adds, the propaganda, the Facebook pages, the twitter, I want to see the influential data, that was so impactful that no human could resist and had to change their total emotional direction to vote for trump. Please post 1, just 1 PLEASE

onlyinboards 03-05-2019 7:28 AM

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...tion-2016.html

onlyinboards 03-05-2019 7:30 AM

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/u...-facebook.html

shawndoggy 03-05-2019 9:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dougr (Post 1986487)
I just really want to see the adds, the propaganda, the Facebook pages, the twitter, I want to see the influential data, that was so impactful that no human could resist and had to change their total emotional direction to vote for trump. Please post 1, just 1 PLEASE


For that matter aren’t you just questioning the effectiveness of advertising and propaganda altogether? What product have you been forced to buy as a result of advertising? So it must not work, right? Complete waste of $$$.

dougr 03-05-2019 4:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onlyinboards (Post 1986490)

none of these are making me vote for trump or would have made me vote for trump. i guess there really was not anything that would change someones mind in advertising.

denverd1 03-06-2019 9:33 AM

nothing is "making you vote for Trump" but to say that ads don't shape our view is bullshet. There's a reason you can't watch cable TV for 5 minutes without seeing several ads with the volume twice as loud as the show you were watching. It's a 100 billion dollar industry and not going away.

I remember thinking that some of the meme's and graphics on FB were really well done for a simpleton with too much time on their hands but didn't think much of it beyond that. What does piss me off is the countless billions of tax dollars spent investigating Trump and the so called collusion. If nothing's been found in 2 years, move along. Bigger problems in this country.

wake77 03-07-2019 1:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by denverd1 (Post 1986547)
nothing is "making you vote for Trump" but to say that ads don't shape our view is bullshet. There's a reason you can't watch cable TV for 5 minutes without seeing several ads with the volume twice as loud as the show you were watching. It's a 100 billion dollar industry and not going away.

I remember thinking that some of the meme's and graphics on FB were really well done for a simpleton with too much time on their hands but didn't think much of it beyond that. What does piss me off is the countless billions of tax dollars spent investigating Trump and the so called collusion. If nothing's been found in 2 years, move along. Bigger problems in this country.

Dude, the Mueller investigation has cost around $25 million.

Here is your EUREKA! moment. I'm sure you read some meme on Facebook that the Mueller investigation is costing "countless billions of tax dollars". You then, for some unknown reason other than you are a gullible person that will obviously believe anything that is pro-Trump, bring that here and use it as fact. Maybe the Russians created that meme...

One more thing. I don't remember you Trumpsters being concerned with investigation costs when the GOP launched four of them about the events in Benghazi Not even when they all kept coming up with the same conclusion.

dougr 03-07-2019 6:05 PM

Is is possible that the "new" anti jew problem in the dem party is an actual conspiracy to have the DEMS lose the next election and then promoting the next 4 years being a conspiracy of the Muslim following. Is she a "Spy" actually put in office to help the republicans, Will this be the reason for the 2020 loss of the Dem party? Can we believe this will be their reason? Just saying, its all a RUSSIAN conspiracy and maybe this is the next one?

Should we put Clinton in office? She obviously won, totally unfair correct? So lets just have her run for PRES again:) I would think with all the conspiracy and the Dems being cheated, She should be Running and all the DEMS totally support her? YES?

DeltaHoosier 03-12-2019 9:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wake77 (Post 1986600)
Dude, the Mueller investigation has cost around $25 million.

Here is your EUREKA! moment. I'm sure you read some meme on Facebook that the Mueller investigation is costing "countless billions of tax dollars". You then, for some unknown reason other than you are a gullible person that will obviously believe anything that is pro-Trump, bring that here and use it as fact. Maybe the Russians created that meme...

One more thing. I don't remember you Trumpsters being concerned with investigation costs when the GOP launched four of them about the events in Benghazi Not even when they all kept coming up with the same conclusion.

Well considering Benghazi was a reported undercover operation running guns to rebels all the while letting the people there get murdered then going on national TV to say some video caused it. I would say that needed some investigating.

wake77 03-12-2019 2:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeltaHoosier (Post 1986759)
Well considering Benghazi was a reported undercover operation running guns to rebels all the while letting the people there get murdered then going on national TV to say some video caused it. I would say that needed some investigating.

Maybe so. But 4 investigations is a little excessive, no?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 7:44 AM.