Whats the best way to describe an individual wake board's ability effectively but meaningfully to consumers? <BR> <BR>Ive seen those computer generated graphs, which are influenced by characteristics like pop, speed, landings, etc. And I like where that is going.

Most of all try to be closer to the minimum weight for the board.

it tracks well but breaks loose when you need it too. It has crazy pop, and is fast and has soft landings.

Proho, <BR> <BR>Hahaha. I see that type of description all the time and I'm finding it increasingly unhelpful. Every board seems to be "loose when you want it to be, pops well, good landings, good speed". <BR> <BR>I just would like to see a different approach to evaluating a wakeboard, something more descriptive that actually lets you understand (as much as is reasonably possibel to do from off-water) a wakeboard.