More Violance from the "Progressive Left"
Well what did you think was gonna happen.
Snoop shoots Tump in a video Broadway Stabs Trump in a play Kathey Beheads Trump for photo shoot Madonna says she wants to blow up the White House in a speech to thousands Is it really that shocking that another lefty shoots up a baseball game full of Congressional folk |
Quote:
|
Gotta love the conservatives argument "we need our guns to protect against tyrannical government". Wanna change that stance now that you see what it actually means? This wasn't a law abiding citizen that protected them, it was a cop.
|
And you don't think statements like this have any relevance?
https://images.dailykos.com/images/4...jpg?1497455932 Look, I like Rand Paul, but isn't this statement (probably) exactly what happened? Do you still think he feels the same? |
Quote:
|
That's what cops do. If Scalise wasn't there this morning, would've been much different situation.
I love how we ignore the fact that a Dem shot 3 or 4 people today! Worse than MSM |
It's Obama's fault.
|
Crazy people do crazy things. Cant outlaw it, cant stop it. They are F'n crazy. To try to label crazy people as republicans/libritards/lefty's/right wing....is immature and pointless. Time for the adults in this country to grow up and stop creating fake news. The story is, a nutjob shot up a republican softball practice and got what he deserved. Anything else and your adding to the problem.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871 Not sure what a written threat deposited in the mail has to do with anything you are talking about? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The statute you cited clearly is limited to written threats deposited in the U.S. Mail. Says so itself. I would enjoy watching the hilarity that would ensue from a U.S. Attorney trying to cite the "Lectric Law Library" to prosecute, though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"Beauharnis v. Illinois, the Supreme Court developed a free speech jurisprudence that loosened most aspects of the free speech doctrine.[85] In 1942, Justice Frank Murphy summarized the case law: "There are certain well-defined and limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise a Constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous and the insulting or 'fighting' words – those which by their very utterances inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."[86]" We could also discuss the over 350 "speech codes" enforced by our universities & other Gov agencies, if you'd like. |
Even after a few years of hooky, Wakeworld never ceases to entertain... :)
|
Quote:
Bring up the speech codes, I would love to! |
Quote:
Yes thank god it wasn't in a gun free zone. Those cops would have had to wait till the guy got out of the gun free zone to shoot him. I want guns to be less accessible so nut jobs like this guy can't get them. I've already read people pro-gun people saying they would have just used a truck of knives, a truck would have been difficult to do this with and a knife wouldn't have been very effective. There are plenty of safe, lawful gun owners. You guys should have your guns, but by letting any dumbass get them you guys are letting it tarnish your image. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Up. Even Berkeley allows hate speech. Fighting words don't fall under free speech, so inciting violence is null. |
<iframe width="854" height="480" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/oZn2fO2Rqy0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Quote:
|
Quote:
In Virginia v. Black, a seminal 2003 Supreme Court decision on cross-burning, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor described “true threats” as statements in which “the speaker means to communicate a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or group of individuals.” In other words, the more specific and immediate the threat, the more likely it’ll be regarded as illegal. |
Quote:
Again, cross burning vs free speech, you're realllyyyyy reaching now. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Pretty much sums up gun violence in America, But they always blame the Deer hunting , sport shooting , self protecting republicans and their grip on the 2nd Amendment.
Attachment 43162 |
Quote:
|
4 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Wait. It's those scary black rifles isn't it? They're so deadly......... hmm yet they account for less than 2% of all gun crimes in the nation. Some would argue less than 1% if you account for shootings not just homicides. Yet again hysteria pushed by the left with no stats whatsoever to support their claims. Attachment 43163 Attachment 43164 Attachment 43165 Attachment 43166 |
Who knew solving gun violence would be so easy, you just need to ask one question when selling a fire arm, are you black and/or Democrat. No gun for you boy-o! Easy, problem solved.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't want people to confuse my post as a stance on gun control. Only the point that Swatguy is pushing crap and claiming it to be fact. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Again, harassment/stalking is not free speech just as burning crosses isn't lol. |
Quote:
Point me to 3 major cities with a more restrictive gun policies than Chicago since you know so much !!!!!!! You're completely wrong again. St. Louis and Memphis are close to the top 5 but not there, they just saw the biggest increases to their homicide "rates ". I can't imagine what may have happened in St Louis that would have made criminals think they can run around shooting people with no fear of being prosecuted. Can you? You want to focus on actual "shootings" when discussing gun issues. Birmingham isn't even close to the top 5 . Detroit , Baltimore , New Orleans . Focusing on one aspect ( the murder rate alone is the wrong approach) Actual shooting rates and shooting incidents along with armed robbers , aggravated criminal sexual assaults, aggravated assaults, home invasions ( all crimes with the use of a weapon) are where you want to focus,,,,,,,,,but wait I am sure all those gamgbangers are flocking to the burbs to go buy their guns . You're an idiot And to say every gangbanger isn't a demcocrat????? Can you point to where that was ever stated ? Again making inferences that were never stated , But I can assure the the gamgbangers in the stats I posted all vote democrat as a group. Election Day is a true spectacle in Chicago. Convicted felons not be allowed voting rights............ WRONG AGAIN. For Christ sake we have convicted felons holding political office. Here is the law that you again know nothing about. Who is the one posting lies ????!??????? Illinois has passed a specific law which spells out what effect a felony conviction can have on your right to vote in Illinois. The law is set out in 10 ILCS 5/3-5. In Illinois, a convicted felon has just as much of a right to vote as any other citizen in the state. As long as you are not incarcerated, meaning serving a prison sentence, you can register and cast a vote in Illinois. Thanks for playing as usual. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And dude, Ann pulled out of that speech, what are you talking about? The group who booked her tried to get the school to pay for it. That is a massive difference. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The other speakers don't require security so it isn't an equivalent. I truly can't comprehend how you don't understand this. Do you think it's fair for me to have presidential security so I can speak at my school? No. Because I don't need it. But by that logic Trump shouldn't get it either, can't have it both ways right? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Your complaint is basically that you want schools to fund protection for speech that you like. Highly doubtful that you would care if it was speech you didn't like. I certainly have no interest in forcing schools to use their funds for anything but education. There is not lack of outlets for speakers to push their points of view. So there really is little reason to force schools to allow anyone to speak if they determine that the logistics are too costly. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
<iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2F136 245116406922%2Fphotos%2Fa.539469282751168.10737418 27.136245116406922%2F540631042634992%2F%3Ftype%3D3 &width=500" width="500" height="503" style="border:none;overflow:hidden" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>Antifa and the commie lefts best friend. Police must worry about getting fired, and are not to eager to step in. Berkeley is a communist cesspool. NLG observers observe and wear camera just in case the police try to step in.<iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Rep Scalise has worked tirelessly to attack and prevent the civil rights of the black lesbian capitol police officer that saved his life today. Wonder if he'll have a change of heart after this. Doubt it.
On another note, welcome back "Barry!" |
Quote:
Anything else? |
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
to sum up
|
test
|
test
|
I like how you can only see the replies if you hit "go advanced" and scroll down.
Dennis gotta give credit, you broke this thread! |
Sick
<iframe width="500" height="281" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/pSPvnFDDQHk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 3:48 AM. |