Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Does the AR 15 with a bump stock have the thermal capacity to maintain that type of fire without melting the barrel or have some other failure? Have they been tested for such conditions? Nope. You can do that with a ruger 10-22. a 22 long rifle has a one round stopping rate of 60% which is actually higher than a 9mm or 45 cal hand gun if I saw the statistic correctly. Still has a lethal range of over 100 yards. We hand those over to kids all the time to just shoot in our society. You can get huge drum mags for those. The ruger mini 14 and mini 30 shoot the same rounds as the AR 10 and AR15 (7.62 or 5.56). Don't have the scary stock yet have the exact same function and are cheaper than your typical AR series. Many gang bangers use a good ol 22 cal. Wife had to work a murder scene where a guy just happened to be on a bench waiting for the bus in a parking lot. 2 kids got in an argument/ fight about the one kids girlfriend. The one pulled out a 22. kid shoots at the other kid. Hits the dude on the other side of the parking lot in the chest. Dude died without moving another inch. Just fell over dead. The gangs in new york and other places back in the day used to make zip guns. Use a car antenna lower section from the old cars and put the 22 in the one end and use like rubber band with something to strike the end. Single shot gun. Fun fact. What type of gun did the Germans try and get outlawed in the Geneva Convention post World War 1 because it was too deadly. Answer. The good ol shot gun. You know. The same one that Brandon said you should shoot off your porch. |
Quote:
May as well say all revolvers are military weapons as that was what was carried back in the day. The 1911 semi auto pistol was developed and put into service when? Answer is in the question. 1911. Been in service and pretty much untouched in function for over 110 years. Pistols kill more people in this country than any other firearm each year. Dems went after them for a short time then never hear about them again. Now it is ARs. Then again, how do you argue that something that has been around for over 100 years is a instrument of war today? |
Quote:
The first version of the Lee-Enfield repeating rifle entered into service in 1895. Since then, 17 million units and a number of variants have been produced, and some are still in use today by Commonwealth police forces. The rifle made a name for itself during World War I and II, and created a legacy that endures to this day. Soldiers using the firearm were even able to complete a “mad minute,” in which they could fire between 20 and 30 aimed rounds in 60 seconds. they could be accurately aimed from around 600 meters, while still capable of striking someone over 1,400 meters away Here you have a bolt action rifle that has killed probably well over 100 thousand people around the world. Used in WW1 and WW2 on the front. High fire rate. Long range. Came out over a 125 years ago. Still in service/ just recently retired. Perfectly legal to own because it does not look like our scary version. |
Quote:
Like I said. gun grabber arguments are simply emotions. hunting rifle/ sniper rifles have an extremely higher kill rate than the M16 and M4's per round fired. The AR15 is NOT the same as a M16 or M4 due to the lack of full auto or burst fire. |
Quote:
What are the differences between a 9mm and an AR15 bullet hits its target? Seems it might be important in the convo. https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...6FORM%3DHDRSC3 |
Trumps top financial officer at TrumpOrg just plead guilty to 15 criminal charges. Everyday we learn the guy just cant live w/o surrounding himself with felons doing crimes. Trumps main guy just basically blamed trump org for paying him under the table to avoid paying taxes. I wonder if the IRS can find some agents available to check into this, lol.
What type of person says "Thats the type of guy I want as President"? https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...6c45c8ad339bf8 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So, What is the Republican plan to fight inflation, help on healthcare, increase tax revenues, lower pharma prices, Help the Climate crisis, finally taxing corps? You know, all the things the Dems just did, Again. Nothing? Ive seen nothing but, " We support Trump". With zero policy, zero bills, zero is your future. Watch how red states take credit for what Brandon handed them. They always do. Are you still scared a woman will break into the bathroom and rape you? Good luck with that. Lets look at actual facts, how many times has that happened? I need to know just how scared to be. I would wager a large chunk of $$ that you and Tucker are liars and transgenders have been on the receiving end of violence in bathrooms more than they have dished out. Wanna take the bet? Why do you care what one wants to call themselves? Hell, you call yourself "sane" and youre clearly in a radical dangerous cult. Thought you wanted small Gov, Not getting into everyones lives? You guys are freaking embarrassing to Americans. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I disagree with the premise and dishonesty you come with. Trumps via the democrat controlled congress who actually controls spending, put out trillions to fight covid related economic factors. The current crop of spending is not that and is not just a one time thing. You are talking permanent spending when increasing the size of government departments. This is additive and not a stunt like the covid stuff. If you actually saw Trumps budget plan it cut everything 10% or more right off the top. I remember it well because people were freaking out and were relying on congress to tell him to stuff it.
|
It's time to just give up on making excuses for this lying idiot.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fiction-t...011329493.html Since the FBI searched Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort for top-secret materials that may have been improperly taken there, Trump and his allies have claimed, among other excuses, that the former president had a “standing order” in place that declassified them. "But, according to 18 officials from his administration who spoke to CNN, no such order was ever issued. Several officials reportedly laughed or scoffed at the notion. One called it “bull****.” Many of them even went on the record." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
At the end of the day. Congress creates and passes the budgets. That is literally how the government works. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Did you hear? Biden has a "standing policy" to re-classify everything leaving the WH. Solid as trumps "i declassified" claims lol. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/t...efore-fbi-raid They gave trump multiple opportunities to return classified info, he failed to oblige. Seems another right wing talking point destroyed. |
Quote:
There's a LOT of very clear and consistent info out there about this. What do you think about Trump taking classified docs to Mar Largo, not giving them up and the subsequent raid and all? Let's hear your full take on this. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What he also explained is Biden had to sign off on this because the DOJ was wondering what to do with it as this question. Biden would have had to say he does not recognize this right in regards to Trump like all the other presidents before have recognized. The records act is not even a criminal statute. Search Warrants are a last resort. Search warrants are also supposed to be very specific on what they can take and what they can search. That is your fundamental 4th amendment right. Basically the DOJ violated Trumps 4th amendment rights. What we do know is the Judge who signed the warrant is a magistrate judge. Basically a clerk of judges. He does not typically handle this sort of thing. Usually you would use a level 3 (some name along that line with a 3 in it) judge that has been approved by the Senate for such a historic move. The Judge who did authorize the warrant had to recuse himself once before due to his admitted Trump bias. He has given money to the Obama campaign in the past. Biden allegedly has told the head of the DOJ that he wants him to do something to move on Trump. not sure how this talking point was exposed or if it is real. The group in the FBI is the same group that headed u the Whitmer frame job, the setup in Virginia, the FISA probes of Trump and now this. The take from the rest of the country that you do not listen to is this is just an excuse to get documents from Trump that may have anything to do with Jan 6 and things he may have the proves his accusations against the democrats. It is a fishing exercise to try and keep Trump from running. Now all of a sudden the "Gang of Eight" want to see the documents the DOJ has taken illegally from Trump. |
Quote:
https://apnews.com/article/elections...b1be9d6c4cb8d5 FISA probes?? you still talking about Paige from 2015??? Did anyone indict him?? Arrest him?? Anything?? Or do you just like writing FISA? They are US owned documents, not the property of the former prez. Had any of them proved his previous lies, dont you think he would have shown them? Or does that make too much sense? Explain in English, how the DOJ took "trumps property illegally" or Shut up. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hillary would be the one who possibly should have been raided. She was not a president. She was under investigation for illegally having classified documents. She was direct supena for specific documents and then destroyed them. That by definition is criminal and outwardly criminal at that. If you or I would have flaunted a direct supena for very specific things and then destroyed them, We would be doing 5 to 10. How much time did the try to give Flynn of the Trump administration for "lying to the FBI" when Comey admitted he sent people over before the "administration knew how to deal with these things" (Comey's words in a public interview) to try and get him to lie or quit. The FBI tried to get a guy to lie to them. Think about that for a moment. They are sending agents of the government over to get you to talk about all sorts of stuff and if you misspeak, you are going to jail. You can see where people are pissed and see this as a continuation of dirty politics to keep someone from running. This is corruption of the highest order in peoples minds. |
Quote:
The grifter isnt president either. The grifter is under at least 5-7 state and federal criminal investigations. Including attempting to change the results of a presidential election, fraud, obstruction, tax fraud, conspiracy..... If you or I had classified documents in our possession, the FBI would not have been so kind. Go ahead, blame the FBI because Flynn contacted the Russian ambassador and lied about it. It's the FBI's fault. Think about that for a moment. Only in the cult members minds, normal people know the diff between right and wrong. Possessing classified info that belongs to the US Gov't def wrong. When you only take in far right media you miss most of the facts. |
https://i.redd.it/2rm6ls5d9vj91.png
https://i.imgur.com/5sL0Grt.jpg lol, the smell of desperation. Im a little pissed at my 3rd grade teacher who told me run on sentences and bad grammar would kill my chance at being president. |
ITs gong to be a big nothing burger. Fishing expedition.
|
Quote:
The 1/6 capitol riot he caused and dereliction of duty to defend the constitution. Other 1/6 crimes? The trying to steal an election thing? The replace the US Atty General to involve the DOJ in the big lie scheme? The New York state investigation on his business fraud cases? the one where he plead the 5th 440times. The Georgia election officials he pressured to overturn the actual results election stealing thing? The 7 swing state fake elector scheme he ran? The big lie grift? or something else im sure im forgetting some? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Pretty interesting that little leaks of what is in the boxes just happen to seep out to the public week by week now isn't it? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Either done defending the grifter or the recent level 10 load of damage is indefensible. Thus, weak azz personal attacks is all you have. Jesus would be proud to have you at his side. Maybe i'll go smoke 2 joints and declare "I believe", then ill be a Christian, just like you except i'll have correct moral behavior AND I dont hate most of the world. Winning. |
Quote:
So, you dont care if he sold it to the Saudis? The Chinese? The Russians? All the above? You stop caring about National Security? Seemed it was highly important when that clinton broad may have had a classified document on her computer. Hannity is still talking about it daily after all these years. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Yikes that's a mental picture no one wants. How long until she regains consciousness?
|
funny, judge is going to appose the master to review the DOJ, and they miraculously went through all the paperwork, ITs a big nothing burger, and fake news pounded it, just like all the other fake news.
Funny, FBI and DOJ to to facebook and tell them to kill the Hunter Biden laptop story because its "russian disinfo" The FBI and DOJ have been the swamp. Corruption at all ends. I guess the left was correct, there was election interference, IT WAS THEM AND THE FBI! |
Quote:
Why did your King steal all those Top Secret Documents? What was he trying to do? He was caught Red-Handed 3 separate times and lied about it each time. What was his very legal plan? |
Quote:
The Fauci hoax, so many lies, not enough time to review them all. Wait till Europe has not energy, oh, its only just begun. Boobs running the show, shameful |
Quote:
You are still not answering the Question. More BS. It is a simple Question. Why did he steal a truckload of secret classified documents? What was his very legal plan for them? You appear to lack most of the information on what he did. You forgot he and his attys lie and said they gave it all back...and then they get a very legal subpoena and come to find he has another truck load sitting there. What do you expect the DOJ to do, let him sell US Govt documents? Other than the fact there is zero paper trail and no one else knew he declassified, he waved his magic drumstick and exclaimed "I hearby declassify all" and no one heard him. If you belive that,,, I got a bridge... Why would he declassify? I mean no other president ever did anything like this. If he declassifies and sells to the Saudis or China, or Russia or... ok with you? If he declassifies and our people/spies over seas are killed because of him that ok? He declassifies nuke documents and sells to Russia, you ok with that? Does declassifying make any difference?, our National Security issues dont change because he has a magic drumstick, does it? Good to see you mixing and matching your conspiracy theories, good boy. Grifter lost the popular vote in 2016, squeeked by against a very unpopular HC. Then he lost the Senate and the House immediately after. In 2020 he lost the popular and electoral election (no matter how hard he tried to steal the election). Now after watching the top secret doc theft, the 1/6 hearing, The Georgia State election investigation, NY Biz investigation where he plead the 5th 400 times......he lost the vote of every "normal" republican, all he has left is minority cult45 who enjoy the lies. You think he has a chance? lol, Bring it on. Dont forget, donate, most Billionaires are always asking for your $$. Send it! He needs your $$! Why is Tucker still not releasing hunters laptop? Hasnt he had it for years? He deep state too? How dum can one get? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.politifact.com/article/2...ied-documents/ |
Quote:
That isnt what Navy V. Egan determined. Its Fascist MAGA BS. In addition, If trump un-classifies a document that pertains to US Nat'l Security, IE, if foreign powers had it it would greatly harm the US. Then, It does not matter if he declassifies, It is still a threat to the country. If he declassifies a document that ID's some of our spies at home or overseas, he is putting their lives in danger for no reason other than his pleasure. Real presidents dont put peoples lives in danger for their fun. This type of thing IS NOT done in the US. When a prez wants to De-Classify something he asks an Oversite Dept to see if declassifying would have a detrimental effect on the country. Then he makes a decision. It also does not matter if the stolen documents are "classified" or not, they are the property of the United States, not an ex pres. Not a single MAGAt has explained what the criminal was doing storing a truckload of secret documents at his golf club. Only excuses. The club that has several instances of foreign nationals sneaking in w/o any one knowing...til after the fact. One Chinese, One Russian. Clearly his security sucks. |
Quote:
The majority ruling in the 1988 Supreme Court case Department of Navy v. Egan — which involved the legal recourse of a Navy employee who had been denied a security clearance — addresses this line of authority. "The president, after all, is the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’" according to Article II of the Constitution, the court’s majority wrote. "His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security ... flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the president, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant." Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy, told PolitiFact in 2017 that such authority gives the president the authority to "classify and declassify at will." The situation recalls the "infamous comment" by President Richard Nixon that "when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal." But national-security specialists at the blog Lawfare wrote that this "is actually true about some things. Classified information is one of them. The nature of the system is that the president gets to disclose what he wants." If a president’s appointees disagree with those actions, the president "can overrule their decisions," Turner said. "Within the executive branch, the president is the boss." The rest of what you are trying to point out is conjecture stating if the president did not take the labels off then he did not have the time to say they were declassified. That is simple bull crap. pure conjecture. Look. All the facts are on the Presidents side. They can not prove one way or another what he said and when on this. The Executive Branch is the one who made up the classified system and the President is the Alpha and the Omega on it apparently. Even your expert in the article at the end states: "We’re in uncharted territory on the issue of criminally prosecuting a former president over mishandling classified documents," Moss said. "There is no legal precedent to look to for guidance. It raises all sorts of constitutional implications and it is anyone’s guess how it would play out." Wonder where you have read that before? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Speaking of psycho-exes, here, we have another story showing how valuable the 2nd A is. I can't understand why all you commie leftists want to take our 2A rights away-other than wanting to make sure it's only YOU who can have guns to carry out your fascist wet dreams.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/no-charge...l-camera-video |
Quote:
100% |
Quote:
|
Ooooooh, did you see the RNC has said they are no longer going to foot Trumps legal bills? That is interesting, wonder if that means he will announce before the midterms? I bet Trump gets all salty about it and try's to burn the RNC down. That would be a shame if Trump sunk the republicans midterm hopes just to be a spiteful baby and "teach them a lesson" or whatever goes through the narcissists head.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/31/11202...=1661926858429 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Do all the media outlets go thru these Billion $$ suits?? or just the one who cant handle the truth?
https://abcnews.go.com/US/fox-news-s...ry?id=89069237 |
Quote:
On the plus side at least you now seem to admit he lost the election. |
1 Attachment(s)
Soooooo these documents marked Secret/Top secret from the Trump raid, are they:
1. Planted 2. Imaginary 3. Documents already given back 4. Not top secret 5. Top secret but declassified 6. Stolen So hard to keep up. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=ralph;2015801]Errrrr no actually. Trump asked for the FBI to release the affidavit and evidence register for "Transparency" so they did. Trumps own goal is only evidence of his stupidity, nothing else.[/QUOTE
They have been leaking bits and pieces the whole time. Trump wants them to release it all not bits and pieces. Again he declassified. The document side is a non criminal. Sounds to me like the democrats are trying to set him up for some sort of obstruction. Pretty typical. Go in and force an altercation with the Feds then say the person the Feds tried to bully obstructed them. Pretty typical operation for them is sounds like. |
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=DeltaHoosier;2015809]
Quote:
Tighten down your steel backed alum head piece, lol. You would have to be a complete fool to actually believe what you write. Its hysterical. Declassified???, as if it matters. It does not. Trump refused to return stolen documents for over a year and a half. The DOJ and a grand jury asked nicely. Trump returned a few docs, the feds, not satisfied asked for confirmation. They came out, took more documents (many classified) and afterwards trumps attys signed off on paperwork VERIFYING ALL WAS GONE. Then after another subpoena the feds showed up again and low and behold trump was hiding more classified documents, over 100 of them. The Feds, in an hour found hundreds more documents after trumps attys spent weeks "searching". Trump refusal to comply was the only constant. The DOJ has all the receipts to destroy your fairy tale. |
[QUOTE=95sn;2015812]
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=markj;2015817]
Quote:
Face it. Delta cant handle the truth. I caught him in 3 blatant lies all on the same day, i proved it in black and white. He cried and went home. He is beaten down and is hiding from another online wakeworld backhand. I get it, I can understand why you both would run home. Your guy is imploding and the lies wont make sense to anyone much longer. Today, an ex cop that got caught at Trumps 1/6 party just got sentenced to10 years for beating another cop. Is that the Winning trump promised? How bout the dead guy who went after FBI, dead in a cornfield, that winning? The normal republicans checked out after 1/6. The average trump fans are falling out now. 7-8 Federal and State criminal and Civil investigations isnt normal, the guy is a criminal. His lawyers are lawyering up. Eventually, all that will remain is the lowest of the low, those fully deep in the cult, the 1/6ers, the ones arming up, the Lets GO Brandon bumper sticker guys, the holders of the six-pack ab trump Superman Flags... all ushered to violence by trump, tucker, AM Radio devils.... So, who you wanna end up with? |
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=95sn;2015819]
Quote:
|
[QUOTE=markj;2015820]
Quote:
https://www.npr.org/2022/09/02/11206...ump-mar-a-lago https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donal...b06389482c98df |
Barr sums it up pretty well. He would know.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/bill-barr...191001230.html “Let me just say, I think the driver on this from the beginning was, you know, loads of classified information sitting in Mar-a-Lago. People say this was unprecedented, well it’s also unprecedented for a president to take all this classified information and put them in a country club, OK?” Barr added: “And how long is the government going to try to get that back? They jawbone for a year, they were deceived on the voluntary actions taken, they then went and got a subpoena, they were deceived on that, they feel, and the facts are starting to show, that they were being jerked around and so how long, you know, how long do they wait?!” |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:33 AM. |