Quote:
|
I was out on a local lake over the weekend with some friends and forgot to grab my HL State 2.0 and vest before we left. I figured I would use my friends Byerly AR1 but his HL Index bindings were way too big. I was looking to get some good moldable bindings to replace my HL Remix bindings on my State 2.0 anyway so we ran over to a local pro shop to browse around. I scooped up a vest and, after looking at prices for good bindings at the shop, I figured I would just tough it out over the rest of the weekend. The price for the Ronix One bindings was at retail for $510 and he said he would take $390. I had been keeping my eyes open online at the same binding for $299. He brought the price down to $260 so I bought them. I really liked the high metallic coat on a Ronix Bandwagon ATR that they had but they had it at retail for $639. I talked to the salesperson and he got the price down to $290 so I bought the board, bindings, and a vest. I hated to purchase a whole new setup and I had no idea that the camber boards were such a touchy subject but I needed something affordable just to be comfortable out on the water for the weekend. I figured the camber style would serve as a good backup and I would now have a good continuous, 3 stage, and camber now. I have an extensive background with snowboarding, skateboarding, and surfing so I was really excited to get this thing on the water.
We rushed back to the boat and hit the water. I did not really notice a difference in my weight distribution or stance but the board felt very playful. It was a good playful feeling too. It would slide around when you wanted it too but it was not sloppy and loose like the Slingshot Choice was. The edge did not dig as well as the Byerly AR1 or the HL State 2.0 but it felt strong and dug in plenty while attacking the wake. I did notice an excessive amount of "drag" as everyone else has mentioned. The board felt much slower than any of the others that I have been on. You would think that the drag would wear you out quickly but I really felt relaxed and comfortable. This might be from the more neutral stance but as I said earlier, I didnt notice any drastic change in my stance. Switch riding was a breeze with this board too. I am still pretty shaky when riding switch but this thing felt the most comfortable switch out of any other boards that I have been on. Rough water riding is one of the things that I noticed immediately and nobody else has really mentioned. I assume it is because of the greater contact surface on the water, but I could really feel the "choppy" water underneath me. This was great in smooth water because my launches were very solid and very vertical, but made it pretty frustrating once we did some riding in rougher water. One of the best ways I can describe it is to compare longboarding and shortboarding on a skateboard. Longboards are built to go fast and carve quickly at higher speeds while shortboards are built for huge pop and tricks at lower speeds. You would never see a rider hop on a shortboard to shred a long hill and you would never see a rider take his longboard for a run at the skatepark. So it is all about the type of rider you are or what type of riding you are wanting to do. I will say that the board that seems to do everything well is the Byerly AR1. That board is just as fast and stable as the State 2.0 but launches a lot like the Bandwagon. I can really dial in the W2W jumps or launch into the flats with it. It has been a blast to ride this year. I am hoping that I will get the board to react and ride a bit faster as I get used to it but I really enjoyed the board for a lot of things. I have enjoyed reading about the complexity of the camber boards through this discussion. |
Quote:
Looks like I'm gonna stick with the Pill. |
Quote:
|
Ok. For the speed comparison. I mostly ride a 2013 Code 22 (139), but bought a 2015 Kruz Bio last year. Liked the speed of the Kruz last year as it seemed pretty fast, but broke my leg (fibula) riding very early this season. Needless to say, I didn't get to ride for a while. When I got back behind the boat, the Kruz felt very fast to me, so I switched back to the Code 22. Feels much better while getting back used to riding. How would the Space Blanket, Parks, and Bandwagon compare to the 2013 Code 22 as far as glide speed? I am also thinking of going with a larger board. Not huge, but maybe a 142-143. I have an extensive background in skateboarding, an am curious about camber being more suitable to my riding style. I'm just doing basic W2W airs and getting use to surface spins and switch again. My biggest obstacle right now is my head. I missed a lot of work due to surgeries last year and early this year, so my mind is getting in the way of my progression. Not worried about getting hurt...but missing work is huge with a newborn in the house. I'm 6' tall and 180-185 lbs. Any input is appreciated.
|
how do you think these cambers ride on Kickers and rails at the park? if the SB fails at the boat I might try it finless at the park but not sure it will do well at the park..
thoughts? |
[QUOTE= Rough water riding is one of the things that I noticed immediately and nobody else has really mentioned. I assume it is because of the greater contact surface on the water, but I could really feel the "choppy" water underneath me. This was great in smooth water because my launches were very solid and very vertical, but made it pretty frustrating once we did some riding in rougher water.
[/QUOTE] Has anyone else noticed that the camber boards are worse on choppy water? I am considering buying a Ronix Parks Air Core 2, but at the lake we usually ride at, we are almost always dealing with some wind and boat chop, so I'm hesitant to pull the trigger if this has any merit. I have been riding a slingshot recoil and really liked it, but I broke it this last summer an was looking for something different. Love the idea of riding more front foot heavy, getting consistent straight up pop, and dialing in my W2W stuff. |
Quote:
|
I ride my SpaceBlanket mainly at the cable park but some boat as well. Hands down my favorite board I have rode
|
Erik Ruck had his SB at the cable park one day and he was nice enough to let me take some laps on it. The camber creating such a flat spot on the bottom really locks it into rails. I get crazy air off kickers as well, I've been beating on the board all summer long and it's still running strong.
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hell ya. Go for it |
Quote:
|
If you like orange, the new 2017 Parks is such an awesome ride. I loved all the camber boards,but think they really nailed it with this shape!
|
Has anyone been out on the new 17 Parks? Curious if it feels faster with less camber?
|
Quote:
Yes, and yes! I have been on the new Parks since September and riding it all through winter. The new shape is faster than the previous shape for sure...more refined camber profile, more sidecut and stronger edging. I would say that it is even a touch faster than the Space Blanket, but that could be me taking a somewhat more aggressive edge now. I don't think any camber board when compared to a traditional board will be considered 'fast' because the benefits of camber (neutral riding position and takeoff, feel on the water, soft landings, etc) also create a bit of resistance/drag from the water pressure under your feet. That said I love the perfect balance between speed and camber benefits in the new Parks shape and it is by far the best board I've ever ridden. I guess I should qualify all of this with my background...started wakeboarding at 40 years old, been at it for just five years now but ride a LOT (1-3 days a week all year round is the norm haha) as we love it so much. Started out on the Vault but then went to the One board right after. Loved the One (2012) but found that as I started to actually get good pop my old knees didn't like the 3 stage kick and the landings. I then switched over to camber with the Bandwagon and have actually ridden through Ronix's complete camber evolution....Bandwagon, to Parks, to Space Blanket, to the new Parks (and my Wife rides the Limelight). With each new shape they have made very minor tweaks to the camber profiles of the boards along with changes to the shapes, and each board has gotten better and better. For me, my riding really took off once I got on the camber shapes as I felt like I had more control and could push harder without fearing a rough kick or tough landings. Oh, I should say my only focus in riding is taking all tricks as big as possible wake to wake...don't ever try to nor want to take things to the flats...though it happens on accident here and there! hahahahha https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...b7fc625a28.jpg |
First time on Camber
Got out on my 2015 Parks Air Core 2 for the first time yesterday. Loved it. The first thing I noticed was it feels really stable edge to edge and stable on take offs and landings. Makes it really easy to have a controlled progressive edge and then be able to give a good hard push with both legs at the wake without being thrown off balance in the air. I was getting a lot higher pop than I was last fall on my Slingshot recoil. It did take a little more cut and effort to get across to the other side of the wake or into the flats, but I think only because its transferring that much more energy straight upwards, which is an obvious great trade unless you are wanting to be a "Nascar Ned" Would definitely recommend it!
|
FYI there will be no 2018 Spaceblanket :(
|
This has been a great thread to read through... I am really considering at 2017 Space Blanket,
Currently on a H/L State 2.0 as my beginner board, heel side WTW and almost have toe side, surface 180's and I'm 37 and have been riding for only 2 years... want something with good pop, smooth landings. Figured that going to space blanket may be my next step. Any more thoughts from people that have been riding them a while. |
and.... what would be the difference between 2016 air core model and 2017 model?
at 6ft and 205 lbs should i get the 141 or would the 137 be reasonable? Thanks |
Quote:
As for sizing, at your height/weight I would go 141...you could get away with the 137 if you really wanted as it is a wide board with lots of surface area, but with the air core even the 141 is super light and you would have better pop, softer landings, and an overall easier ride. 2016 to 2017 Space Blanket the change was the addition of the I-beam core which is some of the glass woven together through board...makes it even more responsive and poppy, but both are great boards and very light cores. I rode the 2016 Space Blanket and loved it, went to Parks for 2017 (and again for 2018) as wanted a bit faster board with stronger edging. Any questions or need help, post on up or send me a PM...happy to help! |
So it seems that the camber boards are not being made any more... this concerns me... were they really not up to what they advertised? I am still interested in trying one out but the prices for the 2017's are still up there. anyone have any more thoughts.
|
Quote:
|
Anyone know why the space blanket was discontinued?
|
My understanding is that the Space Blanket being discontinued had more to do with Shota not riding it any more.
|
Quote:
It just has whatever graphic on it to sell boards |
HUH? weird, have not heard that... cause I was just talking with several riders about how it is neat to ride the same board as a pro, and they even had some stories about having boards lost in baggage and being able to borrow another board from another rider is an option since they are the same. Now I have heard of NEW board designs having an old graphic on it until the new design is actually released.... But I can tell you for sure that there is probably more likely hood that the board is the exact same and possible on a rare occasion it would be different.
|
Quote:
Companies press different graphics onto different boards all the time. Just because the graphic is a space blanket doesn’t mean it’s actually a space blanket. Other times you might get different core mills or glass lay ups. I don’t think a traditional foam board would ever work for someone like Randall Harris, nor do I think rusty rides a consumer grade Kruz, it probably has additional glass layup. Define “pro” too. Your local flowed team of “pro and” is not going to get anything bespoke. And any pro can rip any board. It’s all marketing. “Look at what (insert pro here) can do on that board! I should get one!” Ps: this is especially prevalent in snowboarding. If you think pro’s are hitting 100 foot jumps on rocker boards or 3bt or whatever you’re wrong |
I can vouch for simplej on pro boards being different. I actually got a board from a pro last year and noticed some small differences right off the bat. When I asked him about it he responded “Ya we can build these pretty much however we want in the factory”.
I do remember Dowdy lost his luggage at a comp last year and made an Instagram post asking locals to borrow one of his pro models, so maybe his is the same. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I do know that years ago many pro riders were in fact riding foam core models of their Honeycomb and Cwbs special core board but with the graphics from the expensive special core models.. broke so many of both of those and im an amateur im sure the pros would break one on every pass but for sales reasons they needed to appear to be riding the expensive ones..
|
Quote:
I want to get space blanket 2016 (nothing newer locally), and according to Evo "Note on Sizing – These boards are 4-5cm longer than their listed dimensions. The 137cm length measures out to 141cm, while the 141cm length measures out to 147cm." Are you sure that 137 is basically 140...?it should be 142ish. even more important, if the EVO is right, 141 is 147 ...! thats quite of a difference...i am 180 lbs, but i dont want 147 cm board...i just think thats too long for me.Thoughts...? |
Quote:
I am 185 lbs, 5.8' ( 178cm ,and 84 kg)..I had Marek 140 , and i wanted a bit bigger board, and now i am confused what is the CORRECT length of this two ...!Thanks |
Quote:
For you at 185 you can run either, the 137 is going to be bit more like a 140 but with wider center section so you'll get more total surface area than normal 140. The 141 will ride even higher and poppier but you will also have the added length. I rode the 141 in the air core for the bigger size benefits, but the air core is really light so never felt like big board. |
thank you...I don't have option here for Air core ,only atr, so i guess i should go for 137,141 would probably be too heavy....I really hoped to go something around "regular" 143-144,but ok...
|
Sorry guys, one more question
I have only this options locally, if i want to get camber : 2016 Space blanket ATR 137/141 price 350€ ( i know,its too expensive, but this is the price in Germany) 2018 Ronix Parks I-Beam Air Core 3 Wakeboard , price 560€....big price difference,but i don't know is it worthy... What do you think...? I know older Parks were much slower then 2016 Space blanket, i didnt want Parks because of it.I need "updated" info, since this post is really old :) But maybe 2018 is even better then 2016 SB? and do you know about Parks sizing, is it true size or similar like 2016 SB ( 137 is actually 140-141 ,and 141 is about 147cm) Thanks Thank you |
Quote:
The Space blanket is slower than the new Parks. I like the Space Blanket, it's really fun, but the Parks just has that glide speed that makes riding it less work |
Nailed it, SB is a blast to ride but if looking for best performing camber the 2018 Parks air core was by far the best version. Rode it for most of last year and really loved it! https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...c986107167.jpg
|
Just one more question...so , camber is great ,but i would like to learn some basic inverts, like Tantrum and backroll (this one i already know,but i need to master it :) )
Would camber be good for this as well?most of you are speaking about " great landings, easy for knees, w2w jumps..." but what about something like this? probably its the same like any other type of wake board, but still....i wanted 144 cm length so i don't know will this cause troubles.Usually , i was like 138-140 cm I learned Backroll with continuous rocker, but not sure how it will go with camber ,because of different body position. Thanks |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:42 PM. |